Top Challenges in Common Criteria Compliance for Emerging Technologies

The rapid evolution of emerging technologies is reshaping industries and introducing unprecedented levels of innovation. However, this technological advancement also brings new security risks, necessitating stringent compliance with internationally recognized standards. One such standard is Common Criteria (CC), a globally accepted framework for evaluating the security properties of IT products. While CC evaluation ensures a product meets rigorous security requirements, applying this framework to emerging technologies presents several challenges. This article will explore these challenges in detail and provide insights into overcoming them.

‍

By definition of emerging technologies, refers to new, innovative, and rapidly developing technologies that have the potential to impact industries, economies, and societies significantly. These technologies are often in the early stages of development or adoption and may not yet have fully established regulatory, security, or ethical frameworks. They typically bring disruptive change by improving existing solutions or creating new capabilities.

Examples of emerging technologies include artificial intelligence (AI), blockchain, quantum computing, biotechnology, nanotechnology, Internet of Things (IoT), 5G, augmented reality (AR), and autonomous systems. These innovations continuously evolve, often pushing the boundaries of what is currently possible in computing, healthcare, communication, and security.

Emerging Technologies and Their Unique Characteristics

Emerging technologies are reshaping industries and redefining how we interact with the world. Each of these innovations brings unique capabilities and introduces distinct security challenges that must be addressed to ensure compliance with rigorous standards like Common Criteria. Below, we explore several key areas to understand their transformative potential and associated risks.

1. Internet of Things (IoT)

The Internet of Things (IoT) refers to a vast ecosystem of interconnected devices that collect, share, and process data. IoT devices, from smart home appliances to industrial sensors, enhance efficiency and automation across multiple sectors. However, the widespread adoption of this emerging technology presents unique security risks that complicate Common Criteria compliance.

One of the primary challenges of IoT security is the diversity of devices and communication protocols. Since IoT devices have varying hardware capabilities, operating systems, and communication protocols, establishing universal security requirements becomes difficult. This lack of uniformity creates an extensive attack surface, making IoT systems particularly susceptible to unauthorized access, data breaches, and DDoS attacks. 

Furthermore, many IoT devices have limited computing power and memory, which restricts the implementation of complex security measures required for CC evaluation. Ensuring continuous compliance means that firmware and software updates must be rigorously evaluated, but the decentralized nature of IoT makes this process difficult.

2. Artificial intelligence (AI)

Artificial Intelligence (AI) revolutionizes industries by enabling automation, decision-making, and predictive analytics. However, AI's ability to learn and adapt presents challenges in defining static security requirements for CC certification.

Unlike traditional software, AI models continuously evolve, making it challenging to define fixed security parameters. Additionally, adversarial attacks, where malicious actors manipulate AI inputs to trigger incorrect outcomes, pose a significant security threat. AI models often function as "black boxes," which makes it challenging to assess security risks and compliance requirements. Furthermore, AI systems rely on large datasets, which, if not properly secured, can introduce privacy violations and ethical concerns.

‍

3. Blockchain technology

Blockchain technology provides decentralized and tamper-resistant data storage, making it a cornerstone for cryptocurrency, supply chain tracking, and digital identity management. Despite its security advantages, blockchain presents unique obstacles to CC evaluation.

The decentralized nature of blockchain complicates the assignment of security responsibilities. Blockchain networks do not have a central governing authority, like traditional IT systems, making it difficult to determine who should oversee the CC evaluation process. Besides, blockchain networks rely on consensus mechanisms, such as Proof of Work and Proof of Stake, which are vulnerable to Sybil and 51% attacks. 

Hackers can also exploit flaws in smart contracts, leading to financial losses and data breaches. Since blockchain systems use private-public key cryptography, losing private keys can result in permanent data loss, making secure key management a critical component of compliance.

4. 5G Networks

This emerging technology is transforming telecommunications by offering faster speeds and greater connectivity. However, its complexity introduces new cybersecurity challenges.

The implementation of 5G networks involves multiple vendors, each supplying different network components, which leads to inconsistencies in security implementations. Additionally, as more devices connect to 5G networks, the attack surface expands, making them increasingly vulnerable to cyber threats.

Edge computing, a key feature of 5G, processes data closer to the source, introducing security gaps that must be accounted for in compliance assessments. These factors create a challenging landscape for Common Criteria evaluation in 5G technologies.

5. Quantum Computing

Quantum computing promises revolutionary computational power, but its impact on security is a double-edged sword. It can break traditional encryption methods, requiring new security paradigms for CC compliance.

As with other emerging technologies, quantum computing presents significant cryptographic threats, as it has the potential to decrypt current encryption standards, necessitating the adoption of post-quantum cryptography. 

However, the field is still nascent, with no universally accepted security evaluation criteria. Additionally, quantum hardware is prone to errors and instability, making it difficult to define security targets. As the technology matures, Common Criteria evaluation frameworks must adapt to accommodate these new security challenges.

‍

Top Challenges in Achieving Common Criteria Compliance

As organizations strive to meet the stringent requirements of CC compliance, they face numerous hurdles exacerbated by the rapid evolution of emerging technologies. Below, we delve into the primary challenges of aligning these innovations with established security frameworks.

1. Defining Protection Profiles for Emerging Technologies

Protection Profiles (PPs) are standardized security benchmarks for IT products undergoing Common Criteria evaluation. However, the rapid evolution of emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence, blockchain, and quantum computing, presents a significant challenge. Many of these innovations lack predefined PPs, leaving organizations to develop their own Security Targets (STs). 

This process is time-intensive and susceptible to inconsistencies, as organizations may interpret security requirements differently. Furthermore, the novelty of emerging technologies often means that regulatory bodies have yet to establish clear evaluation guidelines, further complicating compliance efforts. Companies struggle to align their products with Common Criteria requirements without established security standards, increasing the risk of vulnerabilities and potential certification delays.

2. Ensuring Security Across Heterogeneous Environments

Modern IT ecosystems are increasingly complex, integrating diverse platforms, devices, and network infrastructures. Emerging technologies, particularly those within IoT, 5G, and cloud computing, introduce new security challenges due to their distributed and interconnected nature. Organizations must conduct extensive interoperability testing to ensure secure communication between hardware and software components. 

Further, risk assessments must account for the evolving attack surface created by integrating emerging technologies with legacy systems. Many legacy environments were not designed with modern security principles, making it challenging to achieve CC compliance without significant modifications. 

Regulatory alignment also adds to the challenge, as compliance frameworks often struggle to keep pace with technological advancements, leaving organizations to interpret security guidelines in the context of emerging technologies.

3. Bridging the Expertise Gap

Common Criteria compliance demands a deep understanding of security evaluations, cryptographic validation, penetration testing, and extensive documentation. However, the fast-paced development of emerging technologies has created a widening expertise gap. Organizations often lack in-house professionals with technical cybersecurity expertise and familiarity with compliance requirements. 

This moves many companies to rely on third-party consultants or accredited evaluation labs such as CCLab to guide them through the certification process. 

The high demand for specialists in cybersecurity and compliance further exacerbates the issue, as organizations must compete for a limited talent pool. As emerging technologies continue to reshape the digital landscape, businesses must invest in training programs and partnerships to build the necessary expertise internally.

4. Adapting Compliance to Rapidly Evolving Threats

The cybersecurity landscape is constantly evolving, with new threats emerging at an unprecedented rate. Emerging technologies introduce opportunities and risks as their adoption expands the potential attack surface for cybercriminals. 

CC compliance frameworks, while robust, often lag behind the rapid pace of innovation, making it challenging for organizations to maintain continuous security assurance. To bridge this gap, security teams must adopt adaptive risk management strategies, continuously monitoring and assessing new vulnerabilities associated with emerging technologies.

By staying informed about the latest advancements, organizations can proactively address security risks before they become widespread. Compliance strategies must also evolve, incorporating real-time threat intelligence and automation to ensure that security measures remain effective in an era of ever-changing technological landscapes. Businesses can achieve long-term cybersecurity resilience only by aligning compliance efforts with the dynamic nature of emerging technologies.

Conclusion

Achieving Common Criteria compliance for emerging technologies is an ongoing challenge that requires collaboration between developers, security evaluators, and regulatory bodies. By addressing the unique security risks of new technologies, organizations can establish robust security frameworks and pave the way for secure adoption.

As an accredited cybersecurity laboratory, CClab provides expert guidance and comprehensive evaluation services to help organizations achieve Common Criteria (CC) certification, ensuring their security and compliance with international standards. With extensive experience in cybersecurity assessments, we streamline the certification process by offering gap analysis, consulting, and formal security evaluations, reducing time-to-market for innovative solutions.